android.gs
Compare
C75 5G vs Galaxy S25 FE

Realme C75 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What C75 5G does better (4) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (20) — every spec side by side.

Realme · 2025C75 5G

7.4Score

4 advantages

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

20 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

6.4Display8.1

4.6Camera9.3

8.1Battery4.8

6.7Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

C75 5GGalaxy S25 FE

	C75 5G	Galaxy S25 FE	Difference
Height	165.7 mm	161.3 mm	+4.4 mm
Width	76.2 mm	76.6 mm	−0.4 mm
Thickness	8 mm	7.4 mm	+0.6 mm
Weight	196 g	190 g	+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C75 5G better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity5,828 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+19%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 FE: No
Energy classA vs B

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than C75 5G?

Peak brightness690 nits vs 1,900 nits2.8×
OLED panelNo · C75 5G: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · C75 5G: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · C75 5G: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · C75 5G: Yes
NFCNo · C75 5G: Yes
Rear cameras1 vs 33×
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · C75 5G: Yes
Max video1080p vs 8K
4K selfie videoNo · C75 5G: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Realme C75 5G7.4	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9
Design
Weight	196 g	190 g
Thickness	8 mm	7.4 mm
Height	165.7 mm	161.3 mm
Width	76.2 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	—	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	LCD	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	392 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	690 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	—	89.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 6300	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	Mediatek	Exynos
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Mali G57 MC2	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,262
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	1	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	1080p	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	8 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,828 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5	5.4
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Ultra Wideband	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	A	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	43 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A