- android.gs
- Compare
- C65 vs V30 Pro
Realme C65 vs Vivo V30 Pro
What C65 does better (3) and where V30 Pro wins (25) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
C65V30 Pro
| C65 | V30 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.6 mm | 164.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 75.1 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 188 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C65 better than V30 Pro?
- Memory card slotYes · V30 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · V30 Pro: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is V30 Pro better than C65?
- AnTuTu score378,813 vs 841,0832.2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,500 vs 3,9822.7×
- Peak brightness625 nits vs 2,800 nits4.5×
- Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · C65: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · C65: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · C65: Yes
- 5GNo · C65: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 453 ppi+72%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 164.6 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott α glass |
| Colours | Purple Nebula, Black Milky Way | Bloom White, Waving Aqua, Lush Green, Noble Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 625 nits | 2,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,197 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 89.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 378,813 | 841,083 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,500 | 3,982 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,815 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.4 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 70% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 5.0 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
