- android.gs
- Compare
- 9 Pro+ vs Pova 4 Pro
Realme 9 Pro+ vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
What 9 Pro+ does better (16) and where Pova 4 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Display6.3
4.6Performance4.4
8.1Camera4.6
5.2Battery8.2
8.7Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
9 Pro+Pova 4 Pro
| 9 Pro+ | Pova 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.2 mm | 164.8 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 77 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 182 g | 211 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 9 Pro+ better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme633 vs 346+83%
- Wired charging60 W vs 45 W+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,335 vs 2,047+14%
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 450 nits+33%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Weight182 g vs 211 g+16%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than 9 Pro+?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+33%
- AnTuTu score495,096 vs 556,518+12%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 160.2 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition | Fluorite Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 613 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 83% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 495,096 | 556,518 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,335 | 2,047 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 633 | 346 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 68% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.19 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 4.0 | HiOS 8.6 |
