android.gs
Compare
WP39 Pro vs Galaxy S25 FE

Oukitel WP39 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What WP39 Pro does better (8) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (23) — every spec side by side.

Oukitel · 2025WP39 Pro

7.5Score

8 advantages≈ $390

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

23 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

3.9Display8.1

6.8Camera9.3

8.7Battery4.8

7.6Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

WP39 ProGalaxy S25 FE

	WP39 Pro	Galaxy S25 FE	Difference
Height	172.2 mm	161.3 mm	+10.9 mm
Width	81 mm	76.6 mm	+4.4 mm
Thickness	15.2 mm	7.4 mm	+7.8 mm
Weight	360 g	190 g	+170 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is WP39 Pro better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity11,000 mAh vs 4,900 mAh2.2×
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
Endurance per cycle109 h vs 43 h2.6×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 FE: No
Pixel density400 ppi vs 385 ppi+4%

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than WP39 Pro?

Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,900 nits4.2×
OLED panelNo · WP39 Pro: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · WP39 Pro: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · WP39 Pro: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · WP39 Pro: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · WP39 Pro: Yes
Weight360 g vs 190 g+89%
Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+45%
Thickness15.2 mm vs 7.4 mm2.1×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · WP39 Pro: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Oukitel WP39 Pro≈ $3907.5	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9
Design
Weight	360 g	190 g
Thickness	15.2 mm	7.4 mm
Height	172.2 mm	161.3 mm
Width	81 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black, Grey, Green	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,408 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	400 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	60 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	450 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	75.2%	89.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 6300	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,262
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.73"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	—	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	11,000 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	33 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	B	B
Battery charge cycles	1,100	2,000
Endurance per cycle	109 h	43 h
Repairability class	C	C
Drop resistance class	A	A