- android.gs
- Compare
- WP200 Pro vs Galaxy S25 Ultra
Oukitel WP200 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What WP200 Pro does better (6) and where Galaxy S25 Ultra wins (24) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display9.1
7.0Camera9.8
9.0Battery7.1
8.2Features9.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
WP200 ProGalaxy S25 Ultra
| WP200 Pro | Galaxy S25 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 162.8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 77.6 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 8.2 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Weight | 311 g | 218 g | +93 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WP200 Pro better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+76%
- RAM24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- Storage (base)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
- Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 Ultra: No
- Endurance per cycle86 h vs 45 h+92%
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than WP200 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 200 MP+85%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 2,600 nits5.2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · WP200 Pro: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · WP200 Pro: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · WP200 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · WP200 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 44×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+44%
- Weight311 g vs 218 g+43%
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 498 ppi+26%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · WP200 Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 311 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Titanium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 |
| Colours | Black | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 3,120 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 498 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,417 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8% | 92.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,207,809 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 9,846 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 6,687 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.8" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.8 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.25 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 86 h | 45 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F79.59.3
vs
Honor 400 ProvsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9.59.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra9.59.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi 15T Pro9.59.7

