- android.gs
- Compare
- C68 vs Galaxy A17 4G
Oukitel C68 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
What C68 does better (8) and where Galaxy A17 4G wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display7.0
5.4Camera7.8
7.0Battery5.3
4.5Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
C68Galaxy A17 4G
| C68 | Galaxy A17 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 176.2 mm | 164.4 mm | +11.8 mm |
| Width | 83 mm | 77.9 mm | +5.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 7.5 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 245 g | 190 g | +55 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C68 better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Repairability classB vs C
- Drop resistance classA vs B
- Screen size7.2″ vs 6.7″+7%
- Endurance per cycle64 h vs 52 h+25%
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than C68?
- OLED panelNo · C68: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · C68: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Pixel density239 ppi vs 385 ppi+61%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 800 nits+60%
- Weight245 g vs 190 g+29%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+22%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · C68: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 245 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 176.2 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 83 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Gold, Purple, Blue, Gray | Black, Gray, Light blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.2″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,560 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 239 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 526,972 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,052 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.37 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 7 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | 64 h | 52 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | B |
