android.gs
Compare
Pilot 8 vs Camon 50 Pro

OSCAL Pilot 8 vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro

What Pilot 8 does better (13) and where Camon 50 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.

OSCAL · 2026Pilot 8

9.0Score

13 advantages≈ $310

Tecno · 2026Camon 50 Pro

9.1Score

10 advantages

Higher score

8.1Display9.7

7.7Camera9.1

9.1Battery8.5

9.3Features7.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Pilot 8Camon 50 Pro

	Pilot 8	Camon 50 Pro	Difference
Height	178.7 mm	162.4 mm	+16.3 mm
Width	85.4 mm	77 mm	+8.4 mm
Thickness	17.9 mm	7.8 mm	+10.1 mm
Weight	389 g	175 g	+214 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pilot 8 better than Camon 50 Pro?

Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+57%
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Wired charging55 W vs 45 W+22%
Max video4K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
eSIMYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
CPU frequency2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+12%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 4+75%
Pixel density447 ppi vs 429 ppi+4%
USB version3 vs 2+50%
Bluetooth6 vs 5.3+13%

Why is Camon 50 Pro better than Pilot 8?

Weight389 g vs 175 g2.2×
Optical stabilisationNo · Pilot 8: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · Pilot 8: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Pilot 8: Yes
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Thickness17.9 mm vs 7.8 mm2.3×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Pilot 8: Yes
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Screen-to-body ratio75.1% vs 89.6%+19%
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OSCAL Pilot 8≈ $3109.0	Tecno Camon 50 Pro9.1
Design
Weight	389 g	175 g
Thickness	17.9 mm	7.8 mm
Height	178.7 mm	162.4 mm
Width	85.4 mm	77 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	CSG KK9 Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Colours	Black	Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Misty Purple
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,280 px	1,208 px
Resolution (height)	2,772 px	2,644 px
Pixel density	447 ppi	429 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	600 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	75.1%	89.6%
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm Dragonwing Q-6690	Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.9 GHz	2.6 GHz
GPU	Adreno	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	1,059,715
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	3,199
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	108 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.67"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	60 fps	—
Selfie camera	50 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,200 mAh	6,500 mAh
Wired charging	55 W	45 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth	6	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.97 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HIOS 16
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	800	—
Endurance per cycle	96 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	A	—