- android.gs
- Compare
- C80 vs Redmi Note 11S 5G
OSCAL C80 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
What C80 does better (4) and where Redmi Note 11S 5G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display4.8
4.6Camera6.2
6.4Battery6.0
3.9Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
C80Redmi Note 11S 5G
| C80 | Redmi Note 11S 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.6 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 75.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 195 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C80 better than Redmi Note 11S 5G?
- Battery capacity5,180 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight188 g vs 195 g+4%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8.8 mm+2%
Why is Redmi Note 11S 5G better than C80?
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- NFCNo · C80: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · C80: Yes
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+50%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 399 ppi+48%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · C80: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.7% vs 84.8%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Early Sunny Snow, Midnight Black, Navy Blue | Midnight Black, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 399 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 509 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 84.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 360,255 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,820 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,180 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 51% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 13 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G6.16.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12SvsXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G6.76.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10SvsXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G6.46.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F13vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G6.26.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5GvsTecno Pova 46.16.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5GvsMotorola Moto G526.16.2

