- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno9 Pro vs Redmi K50 Gaming
OPPO Reno9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
What Reno9 Pro does better (9) and where Redmi K50 Gaming wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.4
7.1Camera8.0
5.5Battery6.8
7.9Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno9 ProRedmi K50 Gaming
| Reno9 Pro | Redmi K50 Gaming | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 162.5 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 76.7 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 8.5 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 174 g | 210 g | −36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno9 Pro better than Redmi K50 Gaming?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Weight174 g vs 210 g+21%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 800 nits+19%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 8.5 mm+18%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.7% vs 86.2%+4%
Why is Redmi K50 Gaming better than Reno9 Pro?
- Wired charging67 W vs 120 W+79%
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno9 Pro: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+4%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.85 GHz vs 3 GHz+5%
- Charged in 30 min105% vs 176%+68%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 174 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Pink gradient | Black, Gray, Blue, AMG |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 86.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.85 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 105% | 176% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13 | MIUI 13 |
