- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero Ultra vs Redmi K50 Gaming
Infinix Zero Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
What Zero Ultra does better (9) and where Redmi K50 Gaming wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display7.4
8.8Camera8.0
6.7Battery6.8
7.9Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero UltraRedmi K50 Gaming
| Zero Ultra | Redmi K50 Gaming | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.5 mm | 162.5 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.7 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 210 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero Ultra better than Redmi K50 Gaming?
- Main camera200 MP vs 64 MP3.1×
- Wired charging180 W vs 120 W+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi K50 Gaming: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 800 nits+12%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Charged in 30 min250% vs 176%+42%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.5% vs 86.2%+5%
Why is Redmi K50 Gaming better than Zero Ultra?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Stereo speakersNo · Zero Ultra: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+4%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz+20%
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 395 ppi+2%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 165.5 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Coslight Silver, Genesis Noir | Black, Gray, Blue, AMG |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 86.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 730 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.22" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 180 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 250% | 176% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 12 | MIUI 13 |
