- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno8 Pro vs V25
OPPO Reno8 Pro vs Vivo V25
What Reno8 Pro does better (15) and where V25 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno8 ProV25
| Reno8 Pro | V25 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 159.2 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.2 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 186 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno8 Pro better than V25?
- AnTuTu score718,351 vs 461,428+56%
- Wired charging80 W vs 44 W+82%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,395 vs 2,023+68%
- Stereo speakersYes · V25: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Charged in 30 min135% vs 61%2.2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.85 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+19%
- Measured brightness818 nits vs 781 nits+5%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+4%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is V25 better than Reno8 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno8 Pro: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,300 nits+37%
- Memory card slotNo · Reno8 Pro: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · Reno8 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 409 ppi+4%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 159.2 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Glazed Green, Glazed Black, House of the Dragon | Elegant Black, Sunrise Gold, Surfing Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,404 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 818 nits | 781 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 84.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max | Mediatek Dimensity 900 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.85 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 718,351 | 461,428 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,395 | 2,023 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,541 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | 61% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -28.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.94 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | Funtouch 12 |
