- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno8 Pro+ vs iQOO 9
OPPO Reno8 Pro+ vs Vivo iQOO 9
What Reno8 Pro+ does better (9) and where iQOO 9 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.6
7.1Camera8.3
5.8Battery6.3
7.9Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno8 Pro+iQOO 9
| Reno8 Pro+ | iQOO 9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 159.1 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.1 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 8.6 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 200 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno8 Pro+ better than iQOO 9?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,350 mAh+3%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight183 g vs 200 g+9%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 8.6 mm+18%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.3% vs 87.5%+3%
Why is iQOO 9 better than Reno8 Pro+?
- Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno8 Pro+: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Reno8 Pro+: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno8 Pro+: Yes
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,200 nits+26%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Charged in 30 min135% vs 250%+85%
- CPU frequency2.85 GHz vs 2.99 GHz+5%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 159.1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Panda Glass |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Mint | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 749 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.85 GHz | 2.99 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 745,168 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,503 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,350 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | 250% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | Funtouch 12 |
