- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno8 Pro+ vs Galaxy A73 5G
OPPO Reno8 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
What Reno8 Pro+ does better (10) and where Galaxy A73 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.4
7.1Camera8.8
5.8Battery5.3
7.9Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno8 Pro+Galaxy A73 5G
| Reno8 Pro+ | Galaxy A73 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 163.7 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 76.1 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.6 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 181 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno8 Pro+ better than Galaxy A73 5G?
- Wired charging80 W vs 25 W3.2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Charged in 30 min135% vs 45%3×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 800 nits+19%
- CPU frequency2.85 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+19%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 7.6 mm+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.3% vs 87%+4%
Why is Galaxy A73 5G better than Reno8 Pro+?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno8 Pro+: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno8 Pro+: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Memory card slotNo · Reno8 Pro+: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · Reno8 Pro+: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Mint | Gray, Mint, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 87% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.85 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 737,242 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,829 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 686 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.28 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | One UI 6.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
