- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno3 Youth vs Galaxy M51
OPPO Reno3 Youth vs Samsung Galaxy M51
What Reno3 Youth does better (12) and where Galaxy M51 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Display6.0
8.1Camera7.5
3.1Battery8.0
7.1Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno3 YouthGalaxy M51
| Reno3 Youth | Galaxy M51 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.3 mm | 163.9 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 76.3 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.5 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 213 g | −33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno3 Youth better than Galaxy M51?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy M51: No
- 5GYes · Galaxy M51: No
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Charged in 30 min75% vs 35%2.1×
- Weight180 g vs 213 g+18%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 393 ppi+5%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness8 mm vs 9.5 mm+19%
- Process7 nm vs 8 nm+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy M51 better than Reno3 Youth?
- Battery capacity4,025 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+74%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Peak brightness430 nits vs 650 nits+51%
- Memory card slotNo · Reno3 Youth: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · Reno3 Youth: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio83% vs 86.7%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 160.3 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Colours | White, Black, Gold | Celestial Black, Electric Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 430 nits | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 677 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 86.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 266,620 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,774 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,025 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 35% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.61 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7 | One UI 4.1 |
