- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno15 F 5G vs Camon 50 Pro
OPPO Reno15 F 5G vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro
What Reno15 F 5G does better (5) and where Camon 50 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display9.7
8.5Camera9.1
9.1Battery8.5
8.2Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno15 F 5GCamon 50 Pro
| Reno15 F 5G | Camon 50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.1 mm | 162.4 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno15 F 5G better than Camon 50 Pro?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Screen-to-body ratio92.8% vs 89.6%+4%
Why is Camon 50 Pro better than Reno15 F 5G?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Reno15 F 5G: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
- Pixel density397 ppi vs 429 ppi+8%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,208 px+12%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.8 mm+5%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 175 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 158.1 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | — | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.8% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,059,715 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,199 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint, thermometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 67 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
