android.gs
Compare
Reno15 (China) vs Poco X7 Pro

OPPO Reno15 (China) vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro

What Reno15 (China) does better (12) and where Poco X7 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025Reno15 (China)

9.4Score

12 advantages≈ $390

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2025Poco X7 Pro

9.1Score

3 advantages≈ $370

8.4Display8.9

9.7Camera8.8

9.0Battery7.6

8.9Features8.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno15 (China)Poco X7 Pro

	Reno15 (China)	Poco X7 Pro	Difference
Height	151.2 mm	160.8 mm	−9.6 mm
Width	72.4 mm	75.2 mm	−2.8 mm
Thickness	8 mm	8.3 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	187 g	195 g	−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno15 (China) better than Poco X7 Pro?

Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Telephoto cameraYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
4K selfie videoYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
Peak brightness3,600 nits vs 3,200 nits+12%
Weight187 g vs 195 g+4%
Pixel density460 ppi vs 446 ppi+3%
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Thickness8 mm vs 8.3 mm+4%

Why is Poco X7 Pro better than Reno15 (China)?

Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
Screen size6.3″ vs 6.7″+6%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno15 (China)≈ $3909.4	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro≈ $3709.1
Design
Weight	187 g	195 g
Thickness	8 mm	8.3 mm
Height	151.2 mm	160.8 mm
Width	72.4 mm	75.2 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Plastic
Back	Glass	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Reinforced glass	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Blue, Brown, White	Black/Yellow, White, Green, Red (Iron Man Edition)
Display
Screen size	6.3″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,216 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	446 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,600 nits	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,265 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.5%	88.8%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8450	Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.25 GHz	3.25 GHz
GPU	Mali-G720 MC7	Mali-G720 MC7
AnTuTu score	—	1,568,331
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,311
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,880
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	200 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.5
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3.5×	—
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	6,200 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	12.7 h
Wired charging	80 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	—	71%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 16	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	—	C
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	50 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	C