- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno14 Pro vs Axon 60 Ultra
OPPO Reno14 Pro vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
What Reno14 Pro does better (8) and where Axon 60 Ultra wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display9.5
9.6Camera8.8
9.5Battery8.9
9.6Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno14 ProAxon 60 Ultra
| Reno14 Pro | Axon 60 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 163.6 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 9.1 mm | −1.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno14 Pro better than Axon 60 Ultra?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Axon 60 Ultra: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Axon 60 Ultra: No
- Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Axon 60 Ultra: No
- eSIMYes · Axon 60 Ultra: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 9.1 mm+21%
Why is Axon 60 Ultra better than Reno14 Pro?
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 201 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or Crystal Shield Glass | — |
| Colours | Titanium Gray, Brilliant White (Opal White), Purple | Obsidian Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.25 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,048,465 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,406 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 73% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Satellite messaging | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.16 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
