How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno14 Pro vs Poco F7 Ultra

OPPO Reno14 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra

What Reno14 Pro does better (9) and where Poco F7 Ultra wins (13) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno14 Pro
OPPO · 2025Reno14 Pro
9.6Score
9 advantages≈ $800
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7 Ultra
9.4Score
13 advantages≈ $720
8.8Display9.1
8.7Performance9.2
9.6Camera9.2
9.5Battery8.4
9.6Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno14 ProPoco F7 Ultra
77 × 163.47.575 × 160.38.4
Reno14 ProPoco F7 UltraDifference
Height163.4 mm160.3 mm+3.1 mm
Width77 mm75 mm+2 mm
Thickness7.5 mm8.4 mm−0.9 mm
Weight201 g212 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno14 Pro better than Poco F7 Ultra?

  1. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  2. Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 5,300 mAh+17%
  3. Optical zoom3.5× vs 2.5×+40%
  4. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F7 Ultra: No
  5. eSIMYes · Poco F7 Ultra: No
  6. Weight201 g vs 212 g+5%
  7. Screen size6.8″ vs 6.7″+2%
  8. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  9. Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.4 mm+12%

Why is Poco F7 Ultra better than Reno14 Pro?

  1. Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 3,200 nits2.7×
  2. AnTuTu score2,048,465 vs 2,580,520+26%
  3. Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,406 vs 8,887+39%
  5. CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+33%
  6. Max video4K vs 8K
  7. Pixel density450 ppi vs 526 ppi+17%
  8. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  9. Charged in 30 min73% vs 88%+21%
  10. Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,440 px+13%
  11. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
  12. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno14 ProOPPO Reno14 Pro≈ $8009.6
Design
Weight201 g212 g
Thickness7.5 mm8.4 mm
Height163.4 mm160.3 mm
Width77 mm75 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i or Crystal Shield GlassPoco Shield Glass
ColoursTitanium Gray, Brilliant White (Opal White), PurpleBlack, Yellow
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,272 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px3,200 px
Pixel density450 ppi526 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,506 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.1%89.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8450Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.25 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUMali-G720 MC7Adreno 830
AnTuTu score2,048,4652,580,520
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,4068,887
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,204
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.55"1/1.55"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×2.5×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,200 mAh5,300 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—13.5 h
Wired charging80 W120 W
Charged in 30 min73%88%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
SAR (head)1.16 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—63 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—D
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare