How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno14 Pro vs 15 Ultra

OPPO Reno14 Pro vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra

What Reno14 Pro does better (4) and where 15 Ultra wins (17) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno14 Pro
OPPO · 2025Reno14 Pro
9.6Score
4 advantages≈ $800
vs
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Xiaomi · 202515 Ultra
9.6Score
17 advantages≈ $900
Higher score
8.8Display9.0
8.7Performance9.4
9.6Camera9.7
9.5Battery9.3
9.6Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno14 Pro15 Ultra
77 × 163.47.575.3 × 161.39.4
Reno14 Pro15 UltraDifference
Height163.4 mm161.3 mm+2.1 mm
Width77 mm75.3 mm+1.7 mm
Thickness7.5 mm9.4 mm−1.9 mm
Weight201 g226 g−25 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno14 Pro better than 15 Ultra?

  1. Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 5,410 mAh+15%
  2. Weight201 g vs 226 g+12%
  3. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  4. Thickness7.5 mm vs 9.4 mm+25%

Why is 15 Ultra better than Reno14 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score2,048,465 vs 3,030,376+48%
  2. Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 3,200 nits2.7×
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,406 vs 9,710+52%
  4. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  5. CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+33%
  6. Optical zoom3.5× vs 4.3×+23%
  7. Max video4K vs 8K
  8. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  9. Pixel density450 ppi vs 522 ppi+16%
  10. Wireless charging power50 W vs 80 W+60%
  11. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  12. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno14 ProOPPO Reno14 Pro≈ $8009.6
Xiaomi 15 UltraXiaomi 15 Ultra≈ $9009.6
Design
Weight201 g226 g
Thickness7.5 mm9.4 mm
Height163.4 mm161.3 mm
Width77 mm75.3 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassSilicone polymer
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i or Crystal Shield GlassXiaomi Shield Glass 2.0
ColoursTitanium Gray, Brilliant White (Opal White), PurpleBlack, White, Silver Chrome, Green
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,272 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px3,200 px
Pixel density450 ppi522 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,588 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.1%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8450Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.25 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUMali-G720 MC7Adreno 830
AnTuTu score2,048,4653,030,376
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,4069,710
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,626
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.55"1"
Rear cameras34
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×4.3×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,200 mAh5,410 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—16.2 h
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min73%72%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W80 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
SAR (head)1.16 W/kg1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—59 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare