How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno14 F vs Camon 40 Pro

OPPO Reno14 F vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro

What Reno14 F does better (7) and where Camon 40 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno14 F
OPPO · 2025Reno14 F
8.9Score
7 advantages≈ $690
Higher score
vs
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Tecno · 2025Camon 40 Pro
8.6Score
8 advantages
8.2Display8.5
8.3Camera9.1
8.2Battery7.3
9.2Features7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno14 FCamon 40 Pro
75 × 158.17.774.6 × 164.37.3
Reno14 FCamon 40 ProDifference
Height158.1 mm164.3 mm−6.2 mm
Width75 mm74.6 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness7.7 mm7.3 mm+0.4 mm
Weight180 g179 g+1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno14 F better than Camon 40 Pro?

  1. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  2. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+15%
  3. Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,100 nits+27%
  4. Memory card slotYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
  5. eSIMYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
  6. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
  7. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%

Why is Camon 40 Pro better than Reno14 F?

  1. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  2. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  3. 4K selfie videoNo · Reno14 F: Yes
  4. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
  5. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
  6. Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
  7. Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.3 mm+5%
  8. Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno14 FOPPO Reno14 F≈ $6908.9
Design
Weight180 g179 g
Thickness7.7 mm7.3 mm
Height158.1 mm164.3 mm
Width75 mm74.6 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionAGC Dragontrail DT-Star D+Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursGlossy Pink, Luminous Green, Opal BlueEmerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White
Display
Screen size6.6″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,372 px2,436 px
Pixel density397 ppi393 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits1,100 nits
Measured brightness—1,045 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.6%89.7%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1Mediatek Dimensity 7300
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz2.5 GHz
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score—700,909
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—3,218
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—873
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 2.
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.56"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh5,200 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—13.8 h
Wired charging45 W45 W
Charged in 30 min—65%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth5.15.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-28.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised—3
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle63 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare