android.gs
Compare
Reno14 F vs Camon 40 Premier

OPPO Reno14 F vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier

What Reno14 F does better (7) and where Camon 40 Premier wins (12) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025Reno14 F

8.9Score

7 advantages≈ $690

Higher score

Tecno · 2025Camon 40 Premier

8.8Score

12 advantages

8.2Display9.0

8.3Camera9.4

8.2Battery6.3

9.2Features7.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno14 FCamon 40 Premier

	Reno14 F	Camon 40 Premier	Difference
Height	158.1 mm	161 mm	−2.9 mm
Width	75 mm	75 mm	=
Thickness	7.7 mm	7.7 mm	=
Weight	180 g	193 g	−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno14 F better than Camon 40 Premier?

Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+18%
Memory card slotYes · Camon 40 Premier: No
eSIMYes · Camon 40 Premier: No
Weight180 g vs 193 g+7%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%

Why is Camon 40 Premier better than Reno14 F?

Wired charging45 W vs 70 W+56%
Telephoto cameraNo · Reno14 F: Yes
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+52%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
4K selfie videoNo · Reno14 F: Yes
Pixel density397 ppi vs 460 ppi+16%
Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,600 nits+14%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno14 F≈ $6908.9	Tecno Camon 40 Premier8.8
Design
Weight	180 g	193 g
Thickness	7.7 mm	7.7 mm
Height	158.1 mm	161 mm
Width	75 mm	75 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	AGC Dragontrail DT-Star D+	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Glossy Pink, Luminous Green, Opal Blue	Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,260 px
Resolution (height)	2,372 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	397 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	1,600 nits
Measured brightness	—	658 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.6%	89%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1	Mediatek Dimensity 8350
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3.35 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Mali G615-MC6
AnTuTu score	—	1,418,376
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	4,224
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	2,911
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,000 mAh	5,100 mAh
Battery type	—	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	11.6 h
Wired charging	45 W	70 W
Charged in 30 min	—	75%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth	5.1	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-28 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,600	—
Endurance per cycle	63 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	A	—