- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno14 F vs Camon 40
OPPO Reno14 F vs Tecno Camon 40
What Reno14 F does better (11) and where Camon 40 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno14 FCamon 40
| Reno14 F | Camon 40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.1 mm | 164.1 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 74.6 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.3 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 177 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno14 F better than Camon 40?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GYes · Camon 40: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+15%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Camon 40: No
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,300 nits+8%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 40 better than Reno14 F?
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.3 mm+5%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 158.1 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Glass protection | AGC Dragontrail DT-Star D+ | Panda King Glass |
| Colours | Glossy Pink, Luminous Green, Opal Blue | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White, Emerald Glow Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 89.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 575,113 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,986 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 63 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
