android.gs
Compare
Reno14 F 5G vs Galaxy S25 FE

OPPO Reno14 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What Reno14 F 5G does better (8) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (18) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025Reno14 F 5G

8.5Score

8 advantages≈ $420

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

18 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

8.2Display8.1

5.6Performance7.9

8.3Camera9.3

8.2Battery4.8

7.7Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno14 F 5GGalaxy S25 FE

	Reno14 F 5G	Galaxy S25 FE	Difference
Height	158.1 mm	161.3 mm	−3.2 mm
Width	75 mm	76.6 mm	−1.6 mm
Thickness	7.7 mm	7.4 mm	+0.3 mm
Weight	180 g	190 g	−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno14 F 5G better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+22%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 FE: No
Energy classA vs B
Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
Weight180 g vs 190 g+6%
Pixel density397 ppi vs 385 ppi+3%

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than Reno14 F 5G?

Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,671 vs 6,9482.6×
AnTuTu score776,077 vs 1,521,140+96%
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Telephoto cameraNo · Reno14 F 5G: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Reno14 F 5G: Yes
NFCNo · Reno14 F 5G: Yes
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+45%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,900 nits+36%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K selfie videoNo · Reno14 F 5G: Yes
eSIMNo · Reno14 F 5G: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno14 F 5G≈ $4208.5	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9
Design
Weight	180 g	190 g
Thickness	7.7 mm	7.4 mm
Height	158.1 mm	161.3 mm
Width	75 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	Glass
Ingress protection	IP69	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx9	IPx8
Glass protection	AGC Dragontrail DT-Star D+	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Blue, Green, Pink	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,372 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	397 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.6%	89.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Exynos
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	776,077	1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,671	6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,262
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,000 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	43%	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.1	5.4
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	proximity, accelerometer, gyro, fingerprint	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	A	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	43 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A