How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno13 Pro vs iQOO Neo9 Pro

OPPO Reno13 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro

What Reno13 Pro does better (14) and where iQOO Neo9 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno13 Pro
OPPO · 2024Reno13 Pro
9.5Score
14 advantages≈ $1,050
Higher score
vs
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9 Pro
9.2Score
9 advantages
8.8Display9.4
7.9Performance8.6
9.6Camera8.9
9.2Battery8.6
9.6Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno13 ProiQOO Neo9 Pro
76.6 × 162.87.675.7 × 163.58
Reno13 ProiQOO Neo9 ProDifference
Height162.8 mm163.5 mm−0.7 mm
Width76.6 mm75.7 mm+0.9 mm
Thickness7.6 mm8 mm−0.4 mm
Weight195 g190 g+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno13 Pro better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?

  1. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  3. Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  5. Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+12%
  6. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  7. Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
  8. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  9. 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  10. eSIMYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  11. CPU frequency3.35 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+5%
  12. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than Reno13 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score1,154,641 vs 2,386,9032.1×
  2. Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 3,000 nits2.5×
  3. Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,138 vs 5,445+32%
  5. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  6. Max video4K vs 8K
  7. Charged in 30 min77% vs 136%+77%
  8. Weight195 g vs 190 g+3%
  9. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno13 ProOPPO Reno13 Pro≈ $1,0509.5
Design
Weight195 g190 g
Thickness7.6 mm8 mm
Height162.8 mm163.5 mm
Width76.6 mm75.7 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iSchott Xensation Up
ColoursGraphite Grey, Plume Purple, PinkFiery Red, Conqueror Black
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,272 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,800 px
Pixel density450 ppi453 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness1,168 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.9%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8350Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.35 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUMali G615-MC6Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,154,6412,386,903
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,1385,445
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,914—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.49"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3.5×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,800 mAh5,160 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)16.7 h—
Wired charging80 W120 W
Charged in 30 min77%136%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power50 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15Funtouch 14
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle58 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare