android.gs
Compare
Reno13 F vs Poco F7 Pro

OPPO Reno13 F vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

What Reno13 F does better (7) and where Poco F7 Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025Reno13 F

8.8Score

7 advantages≈ $610

Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7 Pro

9.3Score

15 advantages≈ $580

Higher score

8.6Display9.1

8.3Camera9.0

8.1Battery8.1

8.4Features9.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno13 FPoco F7 Pro

	Reno13 F	Poco F7 Pro	Difference
Height	162.2 mm	160.3 mm	+1.9 mm
Width	75.1 mm	75 mm	+0.1 mm
Thickness	7.8 mm	8.1 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	192 g	206 g	−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno13 F better than Poco F7 Pro?

Memory card slotYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
Repairability classB vs C
Drop resistance classB vs C
Weight192 g vs 206 g+7%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 1,000+60%
Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.1 mm+4%

Why is Poco F7 Pro better than Reno13 F?

Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 3,200 nits+52%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+50%
Pixel density395 ppi vs 526 ppi+33%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Energy classB vs A
Charged in 30 min44% vs 81%+84%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno13 F≈ $6108.8	Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro≈ $5809.3
Design
Weight	192 g	206 g
Thickness	7.8 mm	8.1 mm
Height	162.2 mm	160.3 mm
Width	75.1 mm	75 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Luminous Blue	Black, Blue, Silver
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	526 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	2,100 nits	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,478 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.2%	89.3%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	—	2,065,265
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,661
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,921
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.6
Main sensor size	—	1/1.55"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,800 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.8 h
Wired charging	45 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	44%	81%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.1	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	B	A
Battery charge cycles	1,600	1,000
Endurance per cycle	61 h	70 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	B	C