android.gs
Compare
Reno13 F vs X200 FE

OPPO Reno13 F vs Vivo X200 FE

What Reno13 F does better (9) and where X200 FE wins (19) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025Reno13 F

8.8Score

9 advantages≈ $610

Vivo · 2025X200 FE

9.3Score

19 advantages≈ $580

Higher score

8.6Display8.3

8.3Camera8.6

8.1Battery8.9

8.4Features9.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno13 FX200 FE

	Reno13 F	X200 FE	Difference
Height	162.2 mm	150.8 mm	+11.4 mm
Width	75.1 mm	71.8 mm	+3.3 mm
Thickness	7.8 mm	8 mm	−0.2 mm
Weight	192 g	186 g	+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno13 F better than X200 FE?

Optical stabilisationYes · X200 FE: No
Memory card slotYes · X200 FE: No
Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 8002×
Repairability classB vs C
Drop resistance classB vs C
Screen size6.7″ vs 6.3″+6%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Endurance per cycle61 h vs 58 h+5%
Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%

Why is X200 FE better than Reno13 F?

Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 5,000 nits2.4×
Telephoto cameraNo · Reno13 F: Yes
Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+12%
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+55%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
4K selfie videoNo · Reno13 F: Yes
eSIMNo · Reno13 F: Yes
Pixel density395 ppi vs 461 ppi+17%
Weight192 g vs 186 g+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno13 F≈ $6108.8	Vivo X200 FE≈ $5809.3
Design
Weight	192 g	186 g
Thickness	7.8 mm	8 mm
Height	162.2 mm	150.8 mm
Width	75.1 mm	71.8 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2	Schott Xensation Core or Shield Glass
Colours	Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Luminous Blue	Luxe Grey (Black Luxe), Frost Blue (Blue Breeze), Amber Yellow (Yellow Glow), Pink Vibe
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.3″
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,216 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	461 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	2,100 nits	5,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,758 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.2%	90.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1	Mediatek Dimensity 9300+
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3.4 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Immortalis-G720 MC12
AnTuTu score	—	1,805,009
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,606
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,645
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	—	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,800 mAh	6,500 mAh
Battery type	—	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	15.3 h
Wired charging	45 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	44%	53%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.1	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	Funtouch 15
Major OS updates promised	—	4
EU label
Energy class	B	B
Battery charge cycles	1,600	800
Endurance per cycle	61 h	58 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	B	C