- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno13 F vs Xever 7 Pro
OPPO Reno13 F vs RugOne Xever 7 Pro
What Reno13 F does better (12) and where Xever 7 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display8.6
8.3Camera7.6
8.1Battery7.6
8.4Features7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno13 FXever 7 Pro
| Reno13 F | Xever 7 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.2 mm | 173.6 mm | −11.4 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 84.4 mm | −9.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 14.1 mm | −6.3 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 325 g | −133 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno13 F better than Xever 7 Pro?
- Stereo speakersYes · Xever 7 Pro: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Weight192 g vs 325 g+69%
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 5,550 mAh+5%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Xever 7 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 14.1 mm+81%
- Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 1,000+60%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.2% vs 73.3%+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Endurance per cycle61 h vs 59 h+3%
Why is Xever 7 Pro better than Reno13 F?
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- eSIMNo · Reno13 F: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno13 F: Yes
- Energy classB vs A
- Drop resistance classB vs A
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 2,200 nits+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 325 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 14.1 mm |
| Height | 162.2 mm | 173.6 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 84.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Luminous Blue | Black, Beige |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits | 2,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.2% | 73.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 5,550 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.93 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 61 h | 59 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | B | A |
