android.gs
Compare
Reno12 vs Poco F6 Pro

OPPO Reno12 vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro

What Reno12 does better (9) and where Poco F6 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2024Reno12

8.3Score

9 advantages≈ $720

Xiaomi · 2024Poco F6 Pro

8.7Score

14 advantages≈ $750

Higher score

7.8Display9.2

6.0Performance8.1

8.3Camera8.9

7.5Battery5.2

7.4Features7.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno12Poco F6 Pro

	Reno12	Poco F6 Pro	Difference
Height	161.4 mm	160.9 mm	+0.5 mm
Width	74.1 mm	75 mm	−0.9 mm
Thickness	7.6 mm	8.2 mm	−0.6 mm
Weight	177 g	209 g	−32 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno12 better than Poco F6 Pro?

Active use (test)14.9 h vs 10.5 h+42%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Memory card slotYes · Poco F6 Pro: No
Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
4K selfie videoYes · Poco F6 Pro: No
Weight177 g vs 209 g+18%
Measured brightness1,378 nits vs 1,203 nits+15%
Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.2 mm+8%
Loudspeaker loudness-24 LUFS vs -24.8 LUFS+-3%

Why is Poco F6 Pro better than Reno12?

AnTuTu score681,613 vs 1,287,854+89%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,631 vs 4,859+85%
Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 4,000 nits3.3×
Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Pixel density394 ppi vs 526 ppi+34%
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+28%
Charged in 30 min78% vs 158%2×
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno12≈ $7208.3	Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro≈ $7508.7
Design
Weight	177 g	209 g
Thickness	7.6 mm	8.2 mm
Height	161.4 mm	160.9 mm
Width	74.1 mm	75 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP65	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx5	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Matte Brown, Sunset Pink, Astro Silver	Black, White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,412 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	394 ppi	526 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,200 nits	4,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,378 nits	1,203 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.3%	89%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	681,613	1,287,854
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,631	4,859
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	849	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.55"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	14.9 h	10.5 h
Wired charging	80 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	78%	158%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24 LUFS	-24.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 14.1	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	3	3