- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno12 vs Galaxy C55
OPPO Reno12 vs Samsung Galaxy C55
What Reno12 does better (7) and where Galaxy C55 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display7.8
8.3Camera8.5
7.5Battery6.8
7.4Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno12Galaxy C55
| Reno12 | Galaxy C55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.4 mm | 163.9 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 76.5 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 180 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno12 better than Galaxy C55?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 1,000 nits+20%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.3% vs 86.4%+5%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 7.8 mm+3%
Why is Galaxy C55 better than Reno12?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx7+40%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.4 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Matte Brown, Sunset Pink, Astro Silver | Black, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED+ |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,378 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 86.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 644 |
| AnTuTu score | 681,613 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,631 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 849 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 14.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14.1 | One UI 6.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
