- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno12 F 4G vs T3x
OPPO Reno12 F 4G vs Vivo T3x
What Reno12 F 4G does better (11) and where T3x wins (7) — every spec side by side.
8.6Display6.9
3.8Performance5.5
6.8Camera5.4
6.8Battery8.2
4.0Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno12 F 4GT3x
| Reno12 F 4G | T3x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 165.7 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 199 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno12 F 4G better than T3x?
- Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 1,000 nits2.1×
- OLED panelYes · T3x: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+27%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · T3x: No
- Weight187 g vs 199 g+6%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8 mm+4%
Why is T3x better than Reno12 F 4G?
- AnTuTu score431,840 vs 733,620+70%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,468 vs 2,700+84%
- 5GNo · Reno12 F 4G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno12 F 4G: Yes
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | — |
| Colours | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey | Crimson Bliss, Celestial Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 431,840 | 733,620 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,468 | 2,700 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | Funtouch 14 |
