- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno12 F 4G vs WP35
OPPO Reno12 F 4G vs Oukitel WP35
What Reno12 F 4G does better (14) and where WP35 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display3.9
6.9Camera6.4
6.8Battery8.0
4.0Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno12 F 4GWP35
| Reno12 F 4G | WP35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 172.2 mm | −9.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 81 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 14.9 mm | −7.2 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 360 g | −173 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno12 F 4G better than WP35?
- Wired charging45 W vs 18 W2.5×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 450 nits4.7×
- OLED panelYes · WP35: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · WP35: No
- Weight187 g vs 360 g+93%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+27%
- Memory card slotYes · WP35: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · WP35: No
- Dual SIMYes · WP35: No
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 14.9 mm+94%
Why is WP35 better than Reno12 F 4G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 11,000 mAh2.2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- 5GNo · Reno12 F 4G: Yes
- NFCNo · Reno12 F 4G: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 360 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 14.9 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 172.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 81 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey | Gray, Green, Caramel |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 75.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 431,840 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,468 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 11,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
