How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno 15c vs Poco X7 Pro

OPPO Reno 15c vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro

What Reno 15c does better (8) and where Poco X7 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno 15c
OPPO · 2025Reno 15c
9.3Score
8 advantages≈ $380
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi · 2025Poco X7 Pro
9.1Score
6 advantages≈ $370
8.1Display8.9
7.7Performance8.2
9.6Camera8.8
9.1Battery7.6
8.9Features8.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno 15cPoco X7 Pro
74.8 × 1587.875.2 × 160.88.3
Reno 15cPoco X7 ProDifference
Height158 mm160.8 mm−2.8 mm
Width74.8 mm75.2 mm−0.4 mm
Thickness7.8 mm8.3 mm−0.5 mm
Weight197 g195 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno 15c better than Poco X7 Pro?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
  2. Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+8%
  3. Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
  4. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
  5. Pixel density460 ppi vs 446 ppi+3%
  6. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  7. Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.3 mm+6%
  8. Resolution (width)1,256 px vs 1,220 px+3%

Why is Poco X7 Pro better than Reno 15c?

  1. Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 3,200 nits2.7×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,958 vs 6,311+59%
  3. AnTuTu score1,307,414 vs 1,568,331+20%
  4. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  5. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.25 GHz+16%
  6. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno 15cOPPO Reno 15c≈ $3809.3
Design
Weight197 g195 g
Thickness7.8 mm8.3 mm
Height158 mm160.8 mm
Width74.8 mm75.2 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
Back—Silicone polymer
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionScratch-resistant glassCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursDark blue, Aurora blue, WhiteBlack/Yellow, White, Green, Red (Iron Man Edition)
Display
Screen size6.6″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,256 px1,220 px
Resolution (height)2,760 px2,712 px
Pixel density460 ppi446 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,265 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.4%88.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz3.25 GHz
GPUAdreno 722Mali-G720 MC7
AnTuTu score1,307,4141,568,331
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,9586,311
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—3,880
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.5
Main sensor size—1/1.95"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3.5×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—12.7 h
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min71%71%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class—C
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—50 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare