- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno 15c vs T3 Ultra
OPPO Reno 15c vs Vivo T3 Ultra
What Reno 15c does better (9) and where T3 Ultra wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno 15cT3 Ultra
| Reno 15c | T3 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158 mm | 164.2 mm | −6.2 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 74.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 192 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno 15c better than T3 Ultra?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · T3 Ultra: No
- NFCYes · T3 Ultra: No
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+18%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Charged in 30 min71% vs 54%+31%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is T3 Ultra better than Reno 15c?
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 4,500 nits3.8×
- AnTuTu score1,307,414 vs 1,870,185+43%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,958 vs 5,471+38%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+20%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Weight197 g vs 192 g+3%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 7.6 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 158 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Scratch-resistant glass | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Dark blue, Aurora blue, White | Lunar Gray, Frost Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,256 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,760 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,307,414 | 1,870,185 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,958 | 5,471 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 71% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | Funtouch 14 |
