- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X9s Pro vs Reno16 Pro 5G
OPPO Find X9s Pro vs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
What Find X9s Pro does better (7) and where Reno16 Pro 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display9.2
9.6Camera9.6
9.6Battery8.9
9.3Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X9s ProReno16 Pro 5G
| Find X9s Pro | Reno16 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150.5 mm | 151.2 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 72.4 mm | −0.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X9s Pro better than Reno16 Pro 5G?
- Wireless chargingYes · Reno16 Pro 5G: No
- Battery capacity7,025 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+17%
- CPU frequency4.21 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+24%
- Max video8K vs 1080p
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Bluetooth6.1 vs 5.4+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
Why is Reno16 Pro 5G better than Find X9s Pro?
- Optical zoom2.8× vs 3.5×+25%
- eSIMNo · Find X9s Pro: Yes
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.7% vs 93.4%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | — |
| Height | 150.5 mm | 151.2 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 72.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | OnePlus Crystal Guard |
| Colours | Blue/Green, Orange, Titanium, White | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,216 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,107 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 93.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 | Mediatek Dimensity 8550 Super |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.21 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Mali G720 MC8 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,274,090 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 10,598 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2.8× | 3.5× |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,025 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16.0 | ColorOS 16 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
