- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno12 Pro vs Reno16 Pro 5G
OPPO Reno12 Pro vs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
What Reno12 Pro does better (2) and where Reno16 Pro 5G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display9.2
8.4Camera9.6
7.5Battery8.9
7.4Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno12 ProReno16 Pro 5G
| Reno12 Pro | Reno16 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 151.2 mm | +10.3 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 72.4 mm | +2.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno12 Pro better than Reno16 Pro 5G?
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.3″+6%
Why is Reno16 Pro 5G better than Reno12 Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Optical zoom2× vs 3.5×+75%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 1,800 nits+50%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+36%
- eSIMNo · Reno12 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 460 ppi+17%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,216 px+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.4% vs 93.4%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | — |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 151.2 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 72.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | OnePlus Crystal Guard |
| Colours | Space Brown, Sunset Gold, Nebula Silver, Manish Malhotra | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,380 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 93.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Mediatek Dimensity 8550 Super |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali G720 MC8 |
| AnTuTu score | 681,677 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,625 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 854 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 3.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 14.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14.1 | ColorOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
