How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Find X7 Ultra vs iQOO Neo9 Pro

OPPO Find X7 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro

What Find X7 Ultra does better (17) and where iQOO Neo9 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Find X7 Ultra
OPPO · 2024Find X7 Ultra
9.4Score
17 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
vs
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9 Pro
9.2Score
7 advantages
9.3Display9.4
8.7Performance8.6
9.7Camera8.9
7.4Battery8.6
9.0Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Find X7 UltraiQOO Neo9 Pro
76.2 × 164.39.575.7 × 163.58
Find X7 UltraiQOO Neo9 ProDifference
Height164.3 mm163.5 mm+0.8 mm
Width76.2 mm75.7 mm+0.5 mm
Thickness9.5 mm8 mm+1.5 mm
Weight221 g190 g+31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Find X7 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  5. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,472 vs 5,445+19%
  7. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
  8. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  9. Rear cameras4 vs 22×
  10. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  11. 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  12. Pixel density510 ppi vs 453 ppi+13%

Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than Find X7 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score1,994,239 vs 2,386,903+20%
  2. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
  3. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  4. Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
  5. Max video4K vs 8K
  6. Weight221 g vs 190 g+16%
  7. Thickness9.5 mm vs 8 mm+19%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight221 g190 g
Thickness9.5 mm8 mm
Height164.3 mm163.5 mm
Width76.2 mm75.7 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Schott Xensation Up
ColoursBlack, Dark Blue, Light BrownFiery Red, Conqueror Black
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)3,168 px2,800 px
Pixel density510 ppi453 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness1,165 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.3%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,994,2392,386,903
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,4725,445
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,869—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1"1/1.49"
Rear cameras42
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom6×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,160 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)12.8 h—
Wired charging100 W120 W
Charged in 30 min150%136%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power50 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16Funtouch 14
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare