android.gs
Compare
Find X7 Ultra vs Camon 30 Pro

OPPO Find X7 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro

What Find X7 Ultra does better (19) and where Camon 30 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2024Find X7 Ultra

9.4Score

19 advantages≈ $180

Higher score

Tecno · 2024Camon 30 Pro

8.7Score

5 advantages

9.3Display9.5

8.7Performance7.4

9.7Camera9.1

7.4Battery7.2

9.0Features5.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Find X7 UltraCamon 30 Pro

	Find X7 Ultra	Camon 30 Pro	Difference
Height	164.3 mm	164 mm	+0.3 mm
Width	76.2 mm	74.5 mm	+1.7 mm
Thickness	9.5 mm	7.7 mm	+1.8 mm
Weight	221 g	189 g	+32 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Find X7 Ultra better than Camon 30 Pro?

AnTuTu score1,994,239 vs 949,3572.1×
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,869 vs 1,7272.8×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,472 vs 3,931+65%
Telephoto cameraYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
Wireless chargingYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
Major OS updates promised4 vs 22×
Wired charging100 W vs 70 W+43%
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Charged in 30 min150% vs 64%2.3×
Pixel density510 ppi vs 393 ppi+30%
Rear cameras4 vs 22×

Why is Camon 30 Pro better than Find X7 Ultra?

Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Active use (test)12.8 h vs 14.5 h+13%
Weight221 g vs 189 g+17%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Thickness9.5 mm vs 7.7 mm+23%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Find X7 Ultra≈ $1809.4	Tecno Camon 30 Pro8.7
Design
Weight	221 g	189 g
Thickness	9.5 mm	7.7 mm
Height	164.3 mm	164 mm
Width	76.2 mm	74.5 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2	—
Colours	Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown	Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	LTPO AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	3,168 px	2,436 px
Pixel density	510 ppi	393 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,165 nits	998 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.3%	89.9%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	3.1 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Mali-G610 MC6
AnTuTu score	1,994,239	949,357
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,472	3,931
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,869	1,727
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	4	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	6×	—
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	12.8 h	14.5 h
Wired charging	100 W	70 W
Charged in 30 min	150%	64%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	50 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25 LUFS	-25.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 16	HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised	4	2