- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X3 vs X60 Pro
OPPO Find X3 vs Vivo X60 Pro
What Find X3 does better (12) and where X60 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X3X60 Pro
| Find X3 | X60 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 158.6 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 73.2 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 179 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X3 better than X60 Pro?
- Wired charging65 W vs 33 W+97%
- Wireless chargingYes · X60 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · X60 Pro: No
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+7%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Pixel density525 ppi vs 398 ppi+32%
- eSIMYes · X60 Pro: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%
- Rear cameras4 vs 3+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is X60 Pro better than Find X3?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight193 g vs 179 g+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.6 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 158.6 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | Gloss Black, Blue, White | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,216 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 525 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 818 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 639,612 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,490 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.53 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13 | Funtouch 11.1 |
