- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X2 Pro vs Redmi K60E
OPPO Find X2 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K60E
What Find X2 Pro does better (7) and where Redmi K60E wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display8.3
9.6Camera8.0
4.8Battery8.4
8.9Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X2 ProRedmi K60E
| Find X2 Pro | Redmi K60E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 163.1 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 76.2 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 217 g | 202 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X2 Pro better than Redmi K60E?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi K60E: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 86.4%+5%
Why is Redmi K60E better than Find X2 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,260 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+29%
- Wired charging65 W vs 67 W+3%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+9%
- Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
- Weight217 g vs 202 g+7%
- Pixel density513 ppi vs 526 ppi+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 217 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Ceramic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition | Black, White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,168 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 513 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 871 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 86.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 593,717 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 13,245 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,110 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.43" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,260 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7.1 | MIUI 13 |
