- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X2 Pro vs X90
OPPO Find X2 Pro vs Vivo X90
What Find X2 Pro does better (7) and where X90 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display9.0
9.6Camera8.8
4.8Battery6.9
8.9Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X2 ProX90
| Find X2 Pro | X90 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 164.1 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 74.4 mm | = |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 217 g | 196 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X2 Pro better than X90?
- Optical zoom5× vs 2×2.5×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density513 ppi vs 452 ppi+13%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,260 px+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is X90 better than Find X2 Pro?
- Wired charging65 W vs 120 W+85%
- Battery capacity4,260 mAh vs 4,810 mAh+13%
- Charged in 30 min79% vs 188%2.4×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Weight217 g vs 196 g+11%
- Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+7%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 217 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Ceramic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition | Asteroid Black, Breeze Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,168 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 513 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 871 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 91.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | 593,717 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 13,245 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,110 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.43" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,260 mAh | 4,810 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | 188% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7.1 | Funtouch 13 (Global) |
