- android.gs
- Compare
- Find X2 Pro vs iQOO Neo3 5G
OPPO Find X2 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo3 5G
What Find X2 Pro does better (16) and where iQOO Neo3 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display7.3
9.6Camera6.5
4.8Battery4.8
8.9Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X2 ProiQOO Neo3 5G
| Find X2 Pro | iQOO Neo3 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 163.7 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.6 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 217 g | 198 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X2 Pro better than iQOO Neo3 5G?
- Wired charging65 W vs 44 W+48%
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Neo3 5G: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Neo3 5G: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo3 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · iQOO Neo3 5G: No
- Pixel density513 ppi vs 402 ppi+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is iQOO Neo3 5G better than Find X2 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,260 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+6%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Find X2 Pro: Yes
- Weight217 g vs 198 g+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 217 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Ceramic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition | Blue, Black/Dark Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,168 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 513 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 871 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 84% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 593,717 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 13,245 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,110 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.43" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,260 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7.1 | — |
