android.gs
Compare
F31 Pro+ vs Galaxy S25 FE

OPPO F31 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What F31 Pro+ does better (7) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (19) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025F31 Pro+

9.0Score

7 advantages≈ $350

Higher score

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

19 advantages≈ $380

9.4Display8.1

7.8Camera9.3

9.2Battery4.8

7.4Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

F31 Pro+Galaxy S25 FE

	F31 Pro+	Galaxy S25 FE	Difference
Height	163.1 mm	161.3 mm	+1.8 mm
Width	77.6 mm	76.6 mm	+1 mm
Thickness	7.7 mm	7.4 mm	+0.3 mm
Weight	204 g	190 g	+14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is F31 Pro+ better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+43%
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Pixel density453 ppi vs 385 ppi+18%
Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,080 px+19%

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than F31 Pro+?

Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Telephoto cameraNo · F31 Pro+: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · F31 Pro+: Yes
NFCNo · F31 Pro+: Yes
Rear cameras1 vs 33×
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+22%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · F31 Pro+: Yes
Max video4K vs 8K
4K selfie videoNo · F31 Pro+: Yes
eSIMNo · F31 Pro+: Yes
Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 1,900 nits+19%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO F31 Pro+≈ $3509.0	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9
Design
Weight	204 g	190 g
Thickness	7.7 mm	7.4 mm
Height	163.1 mm	161.3 mm
Width	77.6 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	AGC DT-Star D+	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Festival Pink, Himalayan White, Gemstone Blue	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,280 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,800 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	453 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,600 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.1%	89.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Exynos
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.63 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 720	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,262
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	1	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,000 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	80 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	63%	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	1.16 W/kg	0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	43 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A