- android.gs
- Compare
- F27 Pro+ vs Camon 30
OPPO F27 Pro+ vs Tecno Camon 30
What F27 Pro+ does better (10) and where Camon 30 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
F27 Pro+Camon 30
| F27 Pro+ | Camon 30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 165.3 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 75.3 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 198 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F27 Pro+ better than Camon 30?
- 5GYes · Camon 30: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 8 GB16×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 30: No
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Weight177 g vs 198 g+12%
- Charged in 30 min84% vs 67%+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is Camon 30 better than F27 Pro+?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- NFCNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.2×
- Wired charging67 W vs 70 W+4%
- Memory card slotNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · F27 Pro+: Yes
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 7.7 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 165.3 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Blue | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 88.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 591,209 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,976 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 84% | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.97 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
