android.gs
Compare
A5 Pro 5G vs Galaxy S25 FE

OPPO A5 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What A5 Pro 5G does better (7) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (26) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025A5 Pro 5G

7.5Score

7 advantages

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

26 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

6.1Display8.1

4.8Performance7.9

4.6Camera9.3

8.1Battery4.8

9.2Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

A5 Pro 5GGalaxy S25 FE

	A5 Pro 5G	Galaxy S25 FE	Difference
Height	164.8 mm	161.3 mm	+3.5 mm
Width	75.5 mm	76.6 mm	−1.1 mm
Thickness	7.8 mm	7.4 mm	+0.4 mm
Weight	194 g	190 g	+4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is A5 Pro 5G better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+18%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 FE: No
Energy classA vs B
Repairability classB vs C
Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
Endurance per cycle62 h vs 43 h+46%

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than A5 Pro 5G?

AnTuTu score596,993 vs 1,521,1402.5×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,010 vs 6,9483.5×
OLED panelNo · A5 Pro 5G: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · A5 Pro 5G: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · A5 Pro 5G: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · A5 Pro 5G: Yes
Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,900 nits+90%
Pixel density264 ppi vs 385 ppi+46%
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · A5 Pro 5G: Yes
Max video1080p vs 8K

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO A5 Pro 5G7.5	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9
Design
Weight	194 g	190 g
Thickness	7.8 mm	7.4 mm
Height	164.8 mm	161.3 mm
Width	75.5 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	Glass
Ingress protection	IP69	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx9	IPx8
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass 7i, Schott Xensation Alpha	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Purple	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	LCD	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	1,604 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	264 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.3%	89.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 6300	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	Mediatek	Exynos
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Mali G57 MC2	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	596,993	1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,010	6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,262
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	1080p	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	8 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,800 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	43%	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Ultra Wideband	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Proximity sensor, Gyroscope, Accelerometer, Ambient light sensor, Compass, Fingerprint	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	A	B
Battery charge cycles	1,600	2,000
Endurance per cycle	62 h	43 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	A	A