- android.gs
- Compare
- Nord CE 3 Lite vs Reno11 F
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite vs OPPO Reno11 F
What Nord CE 3 Lite does better (4) and where Reno11 F wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display7.7
3.9Performance5.7
6.2Camera7.5
7.2Battery7.2
8.1Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nord CE 3 LiteReno11 F
| Nord CE 3 Lite | Reno11 F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.5 mm | 161.1 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 74.7 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 177 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nord CE 3 Lite better than Reno11 F?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Stereo speakersYes · Reno11 F: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Reno11 F: No
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 62%+29%
Why is Reno11 F better than Nord CE 3 Lite?
- AnTuTu score412,006 vs 841,4972×
- OLED panelNo · Nord CE 3 Lite: Yes
- Peak brightness680 nits vs 1,100 nits+62%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,052 vs 2,398+17%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Nord CE 3 Lite: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Nord CE 3 Lite: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
- Weight195 g vs 177 g+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 165.5 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Panda glass |
| Colours | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray | Palm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 680 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | 649 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.1% | 89.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 412,006 | 841,497 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,052 | 2,398 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 361 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.17 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OxygenOS 13.1 | ColorOS 15 |
