- android.gs
- Compare
- Ace 3 Pro vs iQOO Neo9 Pro
OnePlus Ace 3 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
What Ace 3 Pro does better (9) and where iQOO Neo9 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.4
8.9Performance8.6
8.6Camera8.9
9.2Battery8.6
8.3Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ace 3 ProiQOO Neo9 Pro
| Ace 3 Pro | iQOO Neo9 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 163.5 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.7 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 207 g | 190 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ace 3 Pro better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?
- RAM24 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Battery capacity6,100 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+18%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,859 vs 5,445+26%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than Ace 3 Pro?
- AnTuTu score2,287,429 vs 2,386,903+4%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Weight207 g vs 190 g+9%
- Charged in 30 min104% vs 136%+31%
- Thickness8.7 mm vs 8 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | Gray, White, Green | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,264 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,780 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 89.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,287,429 | 2,386,903 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,859 | 5,445 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,526 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,100 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 104% | 136% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | Funtouch 14 |
