- android.gs
- Compare
- Z70 Ultra vs X200 Pro mini
nubia Z70 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro mini
What Z70 Ultra does better (7) and where X200 Pro mini wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display8.2
9.2Camera9.3
9.0Battery9.1
9.3Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Z70 UltraX200 Pro mini
| Z70 Ultra | X200 Pro mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 150.8 mm | +13.5 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 71.8 mm | +5.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 228 g | 187 g | +41 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Z70 Ultra better than X200 Pro mini?
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+8%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+19%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.3″+9%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
Why is X200 Pro mini better than Z70 Ultra?
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 4,500 nits2.2×
- Wireless chargingNo · Z70 Ultra: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Weight228 g vs 187 g+22%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Z70 Ultra: Yes
- Optical zoom2.7× vs 3×+11%
- Pixel density431 ppi vs 460 ppi+7%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8.2 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 228 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 150.8 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 71.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Longxi glass (gen 2) | — |
| Colours | — | Black, White, Green, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,216 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,688 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,805 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 90.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,779,129 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 8,705 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 5,665 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.28" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2.7× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, color spectrum, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nebula AIOS | OriginOS 5 (China) |
