- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone vs Pova 4 Pro
Nothing Phone vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
What Phone does better (14) and where Pova 4 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display6.3
8.1Camera4.6
4.9Battery8.2
5.4Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
PhonePova 4 Pro
| Phone | Pova 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.2 mm | 164.8 mm | −5.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.2 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 194 g | 211 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 450 nits+11%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Weight194 g vs 211 g+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than Phone?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+33%
- NFCNo · Phone: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Phone: Yes
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 62%+24%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Transparent | Fluorite Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 83% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 556,518 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,047 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 346 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS | HiOS 8.6 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
