- android.gs
- Compare
- CMF Phone 1 vs Y28
Nothing CMF Phone 1 vs Vivo Y28
What CMF Phone 1 does better (13) and where Y28 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display5.0
6.1Camera4.6
7.1Battery4.0
4.0Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
CMF Phone 1Y28
| CMF Phone 1 | Y28 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 163.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75.4 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.1 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 186 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CMF Phone 1 better than Y28?
- Wired charging33 W vs 15 W2.2×
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 840 nits2.4×
- OLED panelYes · Y28: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 269 ppi+47%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Process4 nm vs 7 nm+75%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Y28 better than CMF Phone 1?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · CMF Phone 1: Yes
- Weight197 g vs 186 g+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | DragonTrail Pro | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Light Green | Crystal Purple, Glitter Aqua |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 840 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,259 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 83.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 536,089 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,801 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 851 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 16.2 h | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.98 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS 4.0 | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
