- android.gs
- Compare
- X30 vs Bison 2 Pro
Nokia X30 vs Umidigi Bison 2 Pro
What X30 does better (12) and where Bison 2 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display4.3
8.0Camera6.3
3.8Battery7.3
8.2Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X30Bison 2 Pro
| X30 | Bison 2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 172.1 mm | −13.2 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 83.8 mm | −9.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 12.9 mm | −4.9 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 280 g | −95 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X30 better than Bison 2 Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Bison 2 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Bison 2 Pro: No
- Weight185 g vs 280 g+51%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- eSIMYes · Bison 2 Pro: No
- Thickness8 mm vs 12.9 mm+61%
- Screen-to-body ratio85% vs 70.7%+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/2.2+16%
Why is Bison 2 Pro better than X30?
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+46%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · X30: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X30: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 24 MP+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 280 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 12.9 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 172.1 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 83.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Cloudy Blue, Ice White | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 746 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 70.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Helio P90 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| AnTuTu score | 403,732 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,920 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 24 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 69% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
